I don't know why I'm doing this week's BTT. I've read only one fiction book published in 2007 so far and non-fiction isn't something I usually read.
- What fiction book (or books) would you nominate to be the best new book published in 2007?
- What non-fiction book (or books) would you nominate to be the best new book published in 2007?
- And, do "best of" lists influence your reading?
Best fiction book is easy enough for me. Being an incurable Potter fan(atic), I would have suggested Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows anyway. And with that book being the only one published in 2007 that I read, there aren't any other nominees. I'll skip the best non-fiction book nominations, because I haven't read any.
Do "best of" lists influence me? I think they do. I usually pick books at random from the library, but if I find a book for which I've seen a lot of good reviews, there's a better chance that I'll pick it up.
5 comments:
I really must get around to reading HP5!
I'm a lot like you. I only read a couple of newly published books.
Same here. I too have not read many. However my post is here
I hardly ever do the random library runs now that my library system catalog is online.
The only reason I've read books published in 2007 is because I get review books. Although I liked HP7 very much, it wasn't my fav.
Post a Comment